I have a new article in The American Prospect.
November 2007
Recent Posts
- Mini-Symposium: Research at the Balcones Canyonlands National Wildlife Refuge
- Annual Formal Epistemology Workshops
- Flock of Dodos
- Integrating the 40 Acres
- "Evolutionary Informatics"--The New Face of Creationism
- Bird-Witched
- Texas SBOE and Evolution
- Are you ready to talk history to ecologists?
- Dr. Don McLeroy, Chair, Texas State Board of Education
- Polystoma integerrimum
Recent Comments
- Aanna on A Year in Texas: Is the Houston Toad Still at Stengl?
- Barrett Brown on Flock of Dodos
- Sahotra Sarkar on Texas SBOE and Evolution
- AmZ on Texas SBOE and Evolution
- AmZ on Revival
- Chris Harrison on Revival
- coturnix on Fine-Tuned Deceptions
- AmZ on Fine-Tuned Deceptions
- Nelson Guda on Welcome
- AmZ on Protection of Biodiversity
« A new bird from India | Main | Call for Papers: Eleventh Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge »
08 December 2006
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345b662969e200d8350267c169e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fine-Tuned Deceptions:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Contributors
- Alex Moffett
- James Justus
- Justin Garson
- Patricia Illoldi
- Sahotra Sarkar
- Samraat Pawar
- Trevon Fuller
- Vanessa Lujan
They are going to get a lot farther this time, I think, for two reasons. Firstly, a lot of people take the fact that quantum theory is horrendously difficult and often incomprehensible to mean that it makes no sense whatsoever and must therefore have been invented by a higher intellect to torment the punier ones later evolving in its image. And secondly, unlike biologists, who tend to be a secular lot on the whole, physicists tend to Deism. Not that I'm suggesting this automatically makes them vulnerable to potential complicity in scientific fraud... oh, wait, yes I am.
Posted by: AmZ | 08 December 2006 at 20:39
Sahotra, please e-mail me ASAP!
Posted by: coturnix | 09 January 2007 at 01:02